Bitewing
For revenue cycle teams

Give reviewers fewer mystery rows and more decisions they can defend.

Bitewing helps reviewers spend time on rows that are defensible, urgent, and material - while keeping blocked work out of the ready queue.

Dense review queueDeadline sortingSource on every row
Review queue for 6 sample findings. Rows are sorted by defensibility, urgency, and impact. Selecting a row opens a source inspector beside it without leaving the queue. Sample data, no PHI.
review_queue · monday 08:30
6 of 6 rows · sample data
OrderClaim · DOSLocation · contextExp → actUnder exp.EvidenceWindowOwnerState
0263-D2026-02-26 · Procedure ALocation 14Payer A → Network partner$890act $651$239underComplete6dA. ReyesReviewing
8291-E2026-03-12 · Procedure ALocation 14Payer A → Network partner$890act $651$239underComplete41dA. ReyesReview-ready
0274-G2026-03-03 · Procedure ELocation 09Payer A → Network partner$348act $301$47underStale source27dM. OkaforMonitor
0284-C2026-03-09 · Procedure CLocation 21Payer C$214act $189$25underNeeds source19dM. OkaforBlocked
0271-K2026-03-01 · Procedure FLocation 06Payer B$200act $182$18underConflict12dA. ReyesBlocked
0259-B2026-02-22 · Procedure DLocation 07Payer D$88act $88CompleteMonitor

Selecting a row keeps it lit here while its source chain opens beside it →

Work the right rows first

A priority order you can argue with.

Review queues are sorted by defensibility, urgency, and impact - with the reason visible to the reviewer.

  • DefensibleThe source chain is complete enough to review.
  • UrgentFiling-window risk is visible before work is assigned.
  • MaterialHigher-impact rows can be worked before low-value noise.
  • BlockedMissing evidence stays out of the ready queue.
priority reason · 8291-EWhy this row is first.
  1. DefensibleSource chain complete enough to review.
  2. UrgentFiling-window risk is visible before work is assigned.
  3. MaterialHigher-impact rows can be worked before low-value noise.
  4. RepeatedRelated patterns can be reviewed together.
  5. OwnedA central owner is visible.

Reviewers see why a row is prioritized without exposing the internal calculation.

Trust any selected row

Open the row. The row stays where it was.

Selecting a finding does not navigate away or drop it into a modal. The row stays lit in the queue while its source, comparison, payer context, filing window, and review state open beside it. Context is never lost between the number and its proof.

ClaimContext rowVarianceState
0284-COne row above · Location group A · Procedure E$25 underMissing source
8291-ESelected row opened in place · Location 14 · Procedure A$239 underReview-ready
Source chain
Source line attached · expected amount context
Priority reason
Complete evidence · 27d filing window
Next action
Reviewer confirms before action
0311-HOne row below · Location group B · Procedure A$47 underContext review
Keep blocked work out of the ready queue

Ready means ready. Everything else has a named reason.

Saved views are not folders - they are gates. A finding only reaches Ready now when its evidence is complete enough for review. Missing source, payer-context review, and deadline risk stay in their own views with the reason attached.

Ready nowevidence complete · review-ready
  • 738291-ELocation 14 · Procedure A · $239 under41d

Only evidence-complete, review-ready rows reach this view. Blocked work cannot enter.

Bundle repeat patterns

Repeat patterns should not feel like unrelated rows.

Bitewing groups similar underpayment signals so reviewers can work the shared evidence together, without exposing the prioritization formula or sending anything automatically.

Recurring pattern
Similar payer-context pattern · Procedure A
Related rowsshare source and payer-context signals
Shared evidencereviewed once before action
Impact rangeshown after evidence is complete
8291-ELocation group A$239 under expected
0308-ALocation group Bunder expected
0314-DLocation group Aunder expected
0330-BLocation group Bunder expected
0337-FLocation group Aunder expected
0341-HLocation group Bunder expected

Cluster amount is sample data · no PHI

Review artifact
Shared evidence, held for human review.
Source coverageComplete for selected row
Payer contextNeeds reviewer confirmation before action
Review ownerCentral RCM
Customer channelHuman-approved only