Bring one payer, one fee schedule, or one reimbursement question.
We will walk through one synthetic finding end-to-end, show what Bitewing can prove, and name the evidence that would be required before any real finding becomes ready for review.
Expected minus actual produces the measured gap on the synthetic finding.
A walkthrough that starts from your question.
The most useful walkthrough starts from an operational question: a reimbursement variance, fee schedule review, source readiness question, or recovery workflow your team already cares about. We follow one synthetic claim back to every source on the call.
One finding, followed to every source
- SOURCESource line attachedActual allowed amount stays tied to the original source line.
- EXPECTED AMOUNTSchedule version active on DOSExpected allowed amount is checked against the right context.
- DOS 2026-03-12CONTEXT ACTIVE ON DOSService date is checked before the finding is treated as reviewable.
- PAYER CONTEXTAttached for reviewReimbursement context stays with the finding for reviewer judgment.
- EXPECTED ALLOWED$890Contract-aware amount expected for the service date.
- ACTUAL ALLOWED$651Allowed amount supported by the source line.
- MEASURED DIFFERENCE$239 under expectedExpected minus actual — the only measured gap on the plate.MEASURED
- FILING WINDOW41 DAYSDays remaining to file through the reconsideration channel.
- REVIEW STATEREVIEW-READYHeld for human review before anything leaves.HOLD
You leave with a checklist that states its own readiness.
The same synthetic finding becomes a concise source checklist. Human review signs off before anything leaves, so review and sending never collapse into one step.
The walkthrough ends with a concise source checklist. It names what is proved, what is missing, and what still needs a customer decision.
Sample review checklist · $239 under expected · held for human review
A bounded 30 minutes, four things only.
The source line, service date, expected amount, payer context, measured difference, and review readiness.
A payer, a fee schedule, a sample reimbursement problem, or a source-coverage question.
A synthetic finding and how the same logic would be proven with your sources.
A source checklist, security path if needed, and a bounded pilot scope only if it fits.
After review, the Cal link carries name, email, organization, role, stage, topic, and the non-PHI note as scheduling context.