Bitewing
For finance leaders

Report reimbursement exposure without losing the evidence behind it.

A CFO needs candidate variance, reviewable exposure, submitted amount, and confirmed recovery as separate stages, each linked back to the findings behind it.

Board-readySource-backed exposure
Candidate variance
Start with exposure
Less: source gaps
Hold what is not ready
Reviewable exposure
Evidence-qualified
Recovered
Tracked separately
Exposure bridge · this period
Candidate variance walks down to what is evidence-qualified.
Sample ledger · no PHI
Gross candidate variance walks down to reviewable exposure, then separates submitted and recovered stages.
CandidateCandidatevarianceHoldMissing sourcecoverageHoldExpired filingwindowsHoldContext stillunder reviewHoldReviewerrejectionReviewableReviewableamountTrackedConfirmed recoveryto date
Subtotal
Candidate
Candidate variance

4 rows under expected, summed before any check.

Opens8291-E0284-C0274-G0271-K
Separate the money states

Candidate, reviewable, submitted, and confirmed recovery are four different stages.

Finance reporting breaks when these collapse into one. Bitewing keeps measured variance, evidence-qualified exposure, submitted amount, and confirmed recovery apart, with the definition one click away.

Candidate variance
Candidate
Definition

Potential exposure before evidence and review holds are removed.

Reviewable exposure
Reviewable
Definition

The portion with enough source evidence and context for team review.

Submitted amount
Submitted
Definition

Amount your team approved for the customer-approved recovery path.

Confirmed recovery
Recovered
Definition

Recovered cash after payer response and reconciliation.

Payer concentration with proof

Which payer groups drive reviewed exposure — ranked, not sliced.

Concentration is only useful when each bar links back to findings and source status. A pie hides that. A ranked view keeps the proof attached.

Ranked concentration
Reviewed exposure by submitting payer
Sample data · no PHI
  • 01Payer A
    Impact rangePrimary
    2 findings under expected · links to source state
  • 02Payer C
    Impact rangeSecondary
    1 finding under expected · links to source state
  • 03Payer B
    Impact rangeWatch
    1 finding under expected · links to source state
Ranked concentration across 3 payer groups · sample ledger
Compare locations fairly

Exposure means nothing without volume and coverage beside it.

A small source group with thin evidence coverage is not the same risk as a larger one with complete sources. Bitewing shows claim volume, evidence coverage, and exposure on one line so source groups are compared on equal terms.

Source groupClaimsEvidence coverageReviewed exposure
Location 14
Claims482
Coverage
100%
Exposure
Relative
Location 09
Claims358
Coverage
0%
Exposure
Relative
Location 21
Claims276
Coverage
0%
Exposure
Relative
Location 06
Claims194
Coverage
0%
Exposure
Relative
Location 03
Claims331
Coverage
100%
Exposure
Relative
Location 07
Claims219
Coverage
100%
Exposure
Relative
Human reviewAmber coverage means at least one source gap holds findings back for that source group.
Board-ready reporting

A board number that still knows where it came from.

Export the reviewable figure to the board deck and keep the path back — payer, location, finding, source. The number on the slide drills to the EOB line that produced it, so finance reports only what it can defend.

Board deck · revenue integrity
Q1 2026
Source-backed reviewable exposure
Reviewable
Evidence-qualified and reviewed. Confirmed recovery stays tracked separately.
Candidate
Measured
Reviewable
Qualified
Submitted
Separate
Confirmed
Tracked
Every figure carries a path to source · sample data, no PHI
Path back from the board number
Inspect the finding behind the number

Bring your own ledger and see the bridge on it.

Inspect one fully traceable finding, then walk the same exposure bridge against your own claims with the source citations still attached.