Know which reimbursement sources are ready — and what central teams need next.
Bitewing gives central teams a source-readiness view across locations, contracts, and payer relationships - without changing practice workflows on day one.
“Ready” is not one switch. It is source coverage, contract coverage, payer context, and an owner.
A source group is ready when source coverage, contract coverage, payer context, and a named review owner line up. The matrix shows each component centrally, so a gap is a specific missing source - never a practice-level fire drill.
A blocker names the source, the owner, and the findings it holds.
Location group 18 is not an office problem. It needs one contract source, Contracting owns the request, and the related work stays held until the source lands.
- Source group
- Location group 18
- Missing source
- Current contract source
- Owner
- Contracting
- Work held
- Held until source lands
- Requested
- 2026-06-18
- Next review
- 2026-06-25
This candidate stays held until the contract source lands. The source gap is named before the amount can become reviewable.
Start centrally, without changing practice workflows on day one.
Rollout is explicit about what changes and what stays the same. Read-only to start, one prioritized work surface instead of a new inbox, and reviewed work that travels through the channels you already approved.
- 01
Start read-only
What changesBitewing reads customer-approved reimbursement sources. Nothing posts, nothing edits, nothing sends.
What stays the sameYour PMS, clearinghouse, and posting workflow are untouched on day one.
- 02
One prioritized work surface
What changesHeld findings surface in a single owner-sorted queue, not a new inbox for each office.
What stays the sameTeams keep working their existing day; the queue points to the next gap, not more tabs.
- 03
Use approved channels
What changesReviewed work moves through the channel you already use - with source citations still attached.
What stays the sameNo payer is contacted automatically. A reviewer decides what goes out, and when.
Never rank a source group without its coverage beside it.
A higher eligible-findings count means nothing if the supporting sources are thin. Every comparison row carries the coverage that backs it, so a provisional number reads as provisional - not as a verdict on an office.